Alexey Gladkov <legion@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Eric Biederman pointed out that using .extra1 to pass ipc namespace > looks like an ugly hack and there is a better solution. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87czib9g38.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <legion@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > ipc/ipc_sysctl.c | 26 ++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/ipc/ipc_sysctl.c b/ipc/ipc_sysctl.c > index 15210ac47e9e..eb7ba8e0a355 100644 > @@ -55,20 +50,15 @@ static int proc_ipc_auto_msgmni(struct ctl_table *table, int write, > static int proc_ipc_sem_dointvec(struct ctl_table *table, int write, > void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) > { > - struct ipc_namespace *ns = table->extra1; > - struct ctl_table ipc_table; > + struct ipc_namespace *ns = > + container_of(table->data, struct ipc_namespace, sem_ctls); > int ret, semmni; > > - memcpy(&ipc_table, table, sizeof(ipc_table)); > - > - ipc_table.extra1 = NULL; > - ipc_table.extra2 = NULL; > - > semmni = ns->sem_ctls[3]; > ret = proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); > > if (!ret) > - ret = sem_check_semmni(current->nsproxy->ipc_ns); > + ret = sem_check_semmni(ns); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Can you break this one line change into a separate patch? It is a bug fix so that the entire function uses the same ns value. I expect the change would read easier if the change was separate. > > /* > * Reset the semmni value if an error happens. Eric