On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:55:07 -0600 ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Eric Eric, As you can see, the subject says "Proof-of-Concept" and every patch in the the series says "RFC". All you did was point out problems with no help in fixing those problems, and then gave a nasty Nacked-by before it even got into a conversation. >From this response, I have to say: It is not correct to nack a proof of concept that is asking for discussion. So, I nack your nack, because it's way to early to nack this. -- Steve
