On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 04:38:10PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/15/21 5:41 AM, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
> > index a564f36e260c..5b6940c90c61 100644
> > --- a/fs/io-wq.c
> > +++ b/fs/io-wq.c
> > @@ -1090,10 +1091,7 @@ struct io_wq *io_wq_create(unsigned bounded, struct io_wq_data *data)
> > wqe->node = alloc_node;
> > wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_BOUND].max_workers = bounded;
> > atomic_set(&wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_BOUND].nr_running, 0);
> > - if (wq->user) {
> > - wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_UNBOUND].max_workers =
> > - task_rlimit(current, RLIMIT_NPROC);
> > - }
> > + wqe->acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_UNBOUND].max_workers = task_rlimit(current, RLIMIT_NPROC);
>
> This doesn't look like an equivalent transformation. But that may be
> moot if we merge the io_uring-worker.v3 series, as then you would not
> have to touch io-wq at all.
In the current code the wq->user is always set to current_user():
io_uring_create [1]
`- io_sq_offload_create
`- io_init_wq_offload [2]
`-io_wq_create [3]
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/fs/io_uring.c#n9752
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/fs/io_uring.c#n8107
[3] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/fs/io-wq.c#n1070
So, specifying max_workers always happens.
--
Rgrds, legion
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
