On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 12:53 AM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:33:15PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:21 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:19:12AM -0500, YiFei Zhu wrote: > > > > From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Provide seccomp internals with the details to calculate which syscall > > > > table the running kernel is expecting to deal with. This allows for > > > > efficient architecture pinning and paves the way for constant-action > > > > bitmaps. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > [YiFei: Removed x32, added macro for nr_syscalls] > > > > Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > [...] > > > But otherwise, yes, looks good to me. For this patch, I think the S-o-b chain is probably more > > > accurately captured as: > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Co-developed-by: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > (Technically, https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by > > says that "every Co-developed-by: must be immediately followed by a > > Signed-off-by: of the associated co-author" (and has an example of how > > that should look).) > > Right, but it is not needed for the commit author (here, the From:), > the second example given in the docs shows this: Aah, right. Nevermind, sorry for the noise. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
