On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:25:21PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > The seccomp tests are a bit noisy without CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE (due > to missing the kcmp() syscall). The seccomp tests are more accurate with > kcmp(), but it's not strictly required. Refactor the tests to use > alternatives (comparing fd numbers), and provide a central test for > kcmp() so there is a single XFAIL instead of many. Continue to produce > warnings for the other tests, though. > > Additionally adds some more bad flag EINVAL tests to the addfd selftest. > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> This looks fine, but I wonder if this is enough motivation for taking kcmp() out of CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE guards? Tycho _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
