On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:05:32AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > The main question also is, is there precedence where the kernel just > closes the file descriptor for userspace behind it's back? I'm not sure > I've heard of this before. That's not how that works afaict; it's also > not how we do pidfds. We don't just close the fd when the task > associated with it goes away, we notify and then userspace can close. But there's a mapping between pidfd and task struct that is separate from task struct itself, yes? I.e. keeping a pidfd open doesn't pin struct task in memory forever, right? -- Kees Cook _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
