Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] nsproxy: attach to namespaces via pidfds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 11:25:07AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> I am not thrilled about treating nstype as a flags fields when it is not
>> currently.  It was my hope when I designed the interface that not
>> treating nstype as a flags field would save us from the problem of bits
>> running out.
>
> Hm, I researched the setns() syscall history before that and I didn't
> see that reasoning anywhere. The "nstype" arg was originally advertised
> on the list as "having a flags field is useful in general".

Take a look at the code.  At the end of the day nstype is not treated at
all like a flags field.

It isn't a very important point.  And it was certainly easier to use
the existing bits for essentially their existing meanings.  But it was
certainly something I was thinking at the time.

I think I left it as we can see either way, depending on how things
evolve.

I can imagine a use for a nstype being a single namespace from a pidfd.
Do you have any actual usecases for setting some but not all of the
namespaces from a pidfd?  If we don't have a compelling reason
I would like to kick that can down the road a ways farther.

I am also remembering that that setns freed the low 8 bits.  Which gave
some freedom beyond clone.

>> That aside.  It would be very good if the default version of setting
>> everything from a pidfd would set the root directory from the process it
>> is copying everything else from.
>
> I'm not sure I follow completely. If you specify CLONE_NEWNS then we do
> set the root directory with set_fs_root() in commit_nsset(). Or are you
> saying we should always do that independent of whether or not
> CLONE_NEWNS is specified? And if so could you explain why we'd want
> that? I'm sure I'm missing something!

I am suggesting that when we do:

"setns(pidfd, 0)" or "setns(pidfd, SETNS_PIDFD)"

That the result is not just the namespaces changing but also the root
directory changing to the pids root directory.  Something where the
whole is greater than the parts.

Eric

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers



[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux