> On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 11:44:53PM +0000, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
>
> > +static int ptrace_getfd(struct task_struct *child, unsigned long fd)
> > +{
> > + struct files_struct *files;
> > + struct file *file;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + files = get_files_struct(child);
> > + if (!files)
> > + return -ENOENT;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> > + file = fcheck_files(files, fd);
> > + if (!file)
> > + ret = -EBADF;
> > + else
> > + get_file(file);
> > + spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> > + put_files_struct(files);
may be someone can finally create a helper for this, it can have more users.
say,
struct file *get_task_file(task, fd)
{
struct file *file = NULL;
task_lock(task);
rcu_read_lock();
if (task->files) {
file = fcheck_files(task->files, fd);
if (file)
get_file(file);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
task_unlock(task);
return file;
}
no need to get/put files_struct, no need to take ->file_lock.
> > +
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + ret = get_unused_fd_flags(0);
> > + if (ret >= 0)
> > + fd_install(ret, file);
> > +
> > + fput(file);
this looks wrong or I am totally confused...
if (ret >= 0)
fd_install(file);
else
fput(file);
?
> > @@ -1265,7 +1299,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(ptrace, long, request, long, pid, unsigned long, addr,
> > }
> >
> > ret = ptrace_check_attach(child, request == PTRACE_KILL ||
> > - request == PTRACE_INTERRUPT);
> > + request == PTRACE_INTERRUPT ||
> > + request == PTRACE_GETFD);
Hmm. not sure why do you want this... But OK, we do not need to stop the tracee.
Oleg.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
