On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:27 AM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'd like your perspective on how the capcontid feature was implemented > (aside from the proc/netlink api issue which was intended to be > consistent across loginuid/sessionid/contid/capcontid). Do you see this > feature as potentially solving the nested container issue in child user > namespaces? The patchset is a bit messy at this point in the stack due to the "fixup!" confusion and a few other things which I already mentioned so I don't really want to comment too much on that until I can see everything in a reasonable patch stack. Let's leave that for the next draft. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
