On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 6:15 PM Dmitry Safonov <dima@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As it has been discussed on timens RFC, adding a new conditional branch
> `if (inside_time_ns)` on VDSO for all processes is undesirable.
> It will add a penalty for everybody as branch predictor may mispredict
> the jump. Also there are instruction cache lines wasted on cmp/jmp.
>
> Those effects of introducing time namespace are very much unwanted
> having in mind how much work have been spent on micro-optimisation
> vdso code.
>
> Addressing those problems, there are two versions of VDSO's .so:
> for host tasks (without any penalty) and for processes inside of time
> namespace with clk_to_ns() that subtracts offsets from host's time.
>
> Whenever a user does setns()/unshare() or clone() with CLONE_TIMENS,
> change VDSO image in mm and zap existing VVAR/VDSO page tables.
> They will be re-faulted with corresponding image and VVAR offsets.
[...]
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TIME_NS
> +int vdso_join_timens(struct task_struct *task, bool inside_ns)
The parameter "inside_ns" is never used, right?
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm = task->mm;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +
> + if (down_write_killable(&mm->mmap_sem))
> + return -EINTR;
> +
> + for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
> + unsigned long size = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
> +
> + if (vma_is_special_mapping(vma, &vvar_mapping))
> + zap_page_range(vma, vma->vm_start, size);
> + if (vma_is_special_mapping(vma, &vdso_mapping))
> + zap_page_range(vma, vma->vm_start, size);
Nit: This could be rewritten as:
if (vma_is_special_mapping(vma, &vvar_mapping) ||
vma_is_special_mapping(vma, &vdso_mapping))
zap_page_range(vma, vma->vm_start, size);
> + }
> +
> + up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + return 0;
> +}
[...]
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
