On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 09:57:33AM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 05:41:39PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > and since init_listener() does __get_seccomp_filter() on sucess, it is needed > > uncondtitionally? > > I think there does need to be a __get_seccomp_filter() on success in > init_listener(), because it's paired with the __put_seccomp_filter in > seccomp_notify_release. The listener fd has a reference to the filter, > and that shouldn't go away until after the fd is freed. Oh, sorry. I see what you meant here. Yes, it should be unconditional. Tycho _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
