On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Dongsu Park <dongsu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Patches 1-2 deal with an additional flag of lookup_bdev() to check for > additional inode permission. fuse_blk is less suitable for unprivileged mounting than plain fuse. fusermount doesn't allow mounting fuse_blk unprivileged, so there's little data about that usecase (IIRC ntfs3g guys did that, or at least tried to do it, but I don't remember the details). As such, I think we should leave it out of the initial version. Which means you can drop patches 1-2 from this series. Unless there's a strong use case for this. In which case we should look hard at the differences between fuse_blk and fuse and how that affects unprivileged operation. There are a few assumptions about fuse_blk filesystem being more "well behaved", I think. Thanks, Miklos _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
