Hoist out the nth filter resolving logic that ptrace uses into a new
function. We'll use this in the next patch to implement the new
PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_FILTER_FLAGS command. This is based on an older patch
that I had sent a while ago; it significantly revamps the get_nth_filter
logic based on previous suggestions from Oleg.
Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@xxxxxxxx>
CC: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Akihiro Suda <suda.akihiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/seccomp.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 9541eb379e74..800db3f2866f 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -1179,49 +1179,68 @@ long prctl_set_seccomp(unsigned long seccomp_mode, char __user *filter)
}
#if defined(CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER) && defined(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE)
-long seccomp_get_filter(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long filter_off,
- void __user *data)
+static struct seccomp_filter *get_nth_filter(struct task_struct *task,
+ unsigned long filter_off)
{
- struct seccomp_filter *filter;
- struct sock_fprog_kern *fprog;
- long ret;
- unsigned long count = 0;
-
- if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ||
- current->seccomp.mode != SECCOMP_MODE_DISABLED) {
- return -EACCES;
- }
+ struct seccomp_filter *orig, *filter;
+ unsigned long count;
+ /*
+ * Note: this is only correct because the caller should be the (ptrace)
+ * tracer of the task, otherwise lock_task_sighand is needed.
+ */
spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
+
if (task->seccomp.mode != SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
+ spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
- filter = task->seccomp.filter;
- while (filter) {
- filter = filter->prev;
+ orig = task->seccomp.filter;
+ __get_seccomp_filter(orig);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
+
+ count = 0;
+ for (filter = orig; filter; filter = filter->prev)
count++;
- }
if (filter_off >= count) {
- ret = -ENOENT;
+ filter = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
goto out;
}
- count -= filter_off;
- filter = task->seccomp.filter;
- while (filter && count > 1) {
- filter = filter->prev;
+ count -= filter_off;
+ for (filter = orig; filter && count > 1; filter = filter->prev)
count--;
- }
if (WARN_ON(count != 1 || !filter)) {
- /* The filter tree shouldn't shrink while we're using it. */
- ret = -ENOENT;
+ filter = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
goto out;
}
+ __get_seccomp_filter(filter);
+
+out:
+ __put_seccomp_filter(orig);
+ return filter;
+}
+
+long seccomp_get_filter(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long filter_off,
+ void __user *data)
+{
+ struct seccomp_filter *filter;
+ struct sock_fprog_kern *fprog;
+ long ret;
+
+ if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ||
+ current->seccomp.mode != SECCOMP_MODE_DISABLED) {
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+
+ filter = get_nth_filter(task, filter_off);
+ if (IS_ERR(filter))
+ return PTR_ERR(filter);
+
fprog = filter->prog->orig_prog;
if (!fprog) {
/* This must be a new non-cBPF filter, since we save
@@ -1236,17 +1255,11 @@ long seccomp_get_filter(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long filter_off,
if (!data)
goto out;
- __get_seccomp_filter(filter);
- spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
-
if (copy_to_user(data, fprog->filter, bpf_classic_proglen(fprog)))
ret = -EFAULT;
- __put_seccomp_filter(filter);
- return ret;
-
out:
- spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
+ __put_seccomp_filter(filter);
return ret;
}
#endif
--
2.14.1
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
