On 07/25/2017 04:15 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 14:43 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
...
+static void free_ns_status_cache(struct ima_namespace *ns)
+{
+ struct ns_status *status, *next;
+
+ write_lock(&ns->ns_status_lock);
+ rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(status, next,
+ &ns->ns_status_tree, rb_node)
+ kmem_cache_free(ns->ns_status_cache, status);
+ ns->ns_status_tree = RB_ROOT;
+ write_unlock(&ns->ns_status_lock);
+ kmem_cache_destroy(ns->ns_status_cache);
+}
+
static void destroy_ima_ns(struct ima_namespace *ns)
{
put_user_ns(ns->user_ns);
ns_free_inum(&ns->ns);
+ free_ns_status_cache(ns);
kfree(ns);
}
@@ -181,3 +198,106 @@ struct ima_namespace init_ima_ns = {
.parent = NULL,
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_ima_ns);
+
+/*
+ * __ima_ns_status_find - return the ns_status associated with an inode
+ */
+static struct ns_status *__ima_ns_status_find(struct ima_namespace *ns,
+ struct inode *inode)
+{
+ struct ns_status *status;
+ struct rb_node *n = ns->ns_status_tree.rb_node;
+
+ while (n) {
+ status = rb_entry(n, struct ns_status, rb_node);
+
+ if (inode < status->inode)
+ n = n->rb_left;
+ else if (inode->i_ino > status->i_ino)
+ n = n->rb_right;
+ else
+ break;
+ }
+ if (!n)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return status;
+}
+
+/*
+ * ima_ns_status_find - return the ns_status associated with an inode
+ */
+static struct ns_status *ima_ns_status_find(struct ima_namespace *ns,
+ struct inode *inode)
+{
+ struct ns_status *status;
+
+ read_lock(&ns->ns_status_lock);
+ status = __ima_ns_status_find(ns, inode);
+ read_unlock(&ns->ns_status_lock);
+
+ return status;
+}
...
+
+struct ns_status *ima_get_ns_status(struct ima_namespace *ns,
+ struct inode *inode)
+{
+ struct ns_status *status;
+ int skip_insert = 0;
+
+ status = ima_ns_status_find(ns, inode);
+ if (status) {
+ /*
+ * Unlike integrity_iint_cache we are not free'ing the
+ * ns_status data when the inode is free'd. So, in addition to
+ * checking the inode pointer, we need to make sure the
+ * (i_generation, i_ino) pair matches as well. In the future
+ * we might want to add support for lazily walking the rbtree
+ * to clean it up.
+ */
+ if (inode->i_ino == status->i_ino &&
+ inode->i_generation == status->i_generation)
+ return status;
+
+ /* Same inode number is reused, overwrite the ns_status */
+ skip_insert = 1;
+ } else {
+ status = kmem_cache_alloc(ns->ns_status_cache, GFP_NOFS);
+ if (!status)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ }
What prevents the status from being freed between the read_lock
in ima_ns_status_find() and the write_lock in the following line?
IIUC it's that ns is always current's ima_ns, which will pin the ns
and cause no statuses to be freed. But then the ns should probably
not be passed in here? Or a comment should say that ns must be
pinned?
Just trying to make sure I understand the locking.
iint's are only freed after the last reference to the inode is deleted
in __fput(). Refer to ima_file_free(). ns_status is a bit different
in that they are freed on namespace cleanup.
It should be possible to move the write_lock() above the
status = ima_ns_status_find(ns, inode);
and instead call __ima_ns_status_find() with the write_lock() held.
Stefan
Mimi
+ write_lock(&ns->ns_status_lock);
+
+ if (!skip_insert)
+ insert_ns_status(ns, inode, status);
+
+ status->inode = inode;
+ status->i_ino = inode->i_ino;
+ status->i_generation = inode->i_generation;
+ status->flags = 0UL;
+ write_unlock(&ns->ns_status_lock);
+
+ return status;
+}
--
2.9.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
