Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:39:18AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:54:34AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> > >> > >> > I can't imagine either of these changes making a practical difference >> > to anyone but I am calling them out in case someone can. >> > >> > include/linux/mm_types.h | 1 + >> > kernel/fork.c | 9 ++++++--- >> > kernel/ptrace.c | 26 +++++++++++--------------- >> > mm/init-mm.c | 2 ++ >> > 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> Thanks a huge, Eric! And really sorry for delay in response, >> I managed to miss this quite important mail for me in mail >> storm. Gonna test it and will write you the results. Overall looks >> great, but better be sure and run the tests. >> >> Reviewed-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Eric, on which kernel the patch is on top of? > It doesn't apply on linux-next for some reason. > > | Date: Thu Oct 27 14:21:59 2016 +1100 > | > | Add linux-next specific files for 20161027 > | > | Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I applied it on Linus' master and tests passed fine > (but they were passing fine even without the patch, > only linux-next failed). Odd. I don't think I have taken the old version out of linux-next yet. So you can probably revert the old version out of linux-next and apply this one. All of my development at this point is against v4.9-rc1. I suspect you will find my last version on top of against v4.9-rc1 will pass. Since my tree is only one deep and I don't think anyone except linux-next is based on it, I plan to drop and readd this patch. Especially since it is candidate for backporting. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
