Re: [LKP] More information please. Re: [fs] 54cc07a761: BUG: kernel test crashed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 02:50:58PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

 > > Yes that's the right directions to follow. We'll make the reports more
 > > understandable and the test/bisects more reliable.
 > 
 > Thanks.  Does trinity have a random seed it can export/import to rerun
 > the same tests?  I ask because there was a failure these tests caught
 > that if the right kernel options was enabled was 100% reliable and it
 > blamed a commit 10 patches down from the indicated commit.

It does log the random seed on startup, and can replay it with the -s option

There is some variance if you were to do two runs with the same seed back
to back, because on startup, it walks /proc & /sys, and they'd see different things
so for eg "read() from fd 100" might mean something entirely different.

But as the testbot runs a pretty minimal userspace, only runs trinity once,
and really early in boot, this point might not matter.

	Dave
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers



[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux