Re: [PATCH v2 review 09/11] quota: Handle quota data stored in s_user_ns.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:34:49AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> The more I think of it the more I think that sounds like wisdom.
> Dropping this patch and replacing it by one that just does:
> 
> diff --git a/fs/quota/dquot.c b/fs/quota/dquot.c
> index d8fb0fd3ff6f..9c9890fe18b7 100644
> --- a/fs/quota/dquot.c
> +++ b/fs/quota/dquot.c
> @@ -2273,6 +2273,11 @@ static int vfs_load_quota_inode(struct inode *inode, int type, int format_id,
>                 error = -EINVAL;
>                 goto out_fmt;
>         }
> +       /* Filesystems outside of init_user_ns not yet supported */
> +       if (sb->s_user_ns != &init_user_ns) {
> +               error = -EINVAL;
> +               goto out_fmt;
> +       }
>         /* Usage always has to be set... */
>         if (!(flags & DQUOT_USAGE_ENABLED)) {
>                 error = -EINVAL;
> 
> 
> seems a lot more appropriate at this point.  That is enough to give a
> great big hint there is something that needs to be done but won't
> embrittle the code with untested corner cases.

You'll need to propagate that to all filesystems that have their own
quota implemenation, too.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers



[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux