On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 03:22:22PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > >You forgot to explain why I should care about this. > > As I told this works as low-limit or high-limit which allow to > control cpu time distribution without hard limits and throttling. That's what it does; I get that. However nothing tells me why I should care about it. IOW, its a solution without a problem, and I tend to ignore those -- saves a lot of time on my end. > Present quota/hard limit has well known problems when it throttle task > inside kernel where it holds mutexes. Also it's too strict and doesn't > allow utilization of unused cpu time. See; now you're starting to make sense. You cannot have a patch if you don't have a problem. And this series didn't have a problem to solve. As for the latter; that's a feature for many people I'm told. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
