Le 24/02/2016 23:05, Eric W. Biederman a écrit : [snip]
In the general case the current behavior is random and not something applications can count on, and we would do well to fix it so it is less random. In particular consider the case of an application in a non-initial network namespace creating a new network namespace. It is not even possible to predict what values they will get for sysctls today.
+1
From a backwards compatibility standpoint we are probably better off with copying from the current network namespace rather than the initial network namespace. As that more closely resembles the common case today.
+1 _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
