On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 05:22:33PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:26:07 -0500 > > "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:49:20AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> > > >> > Mandatory locking appears to be almost unused and buggy and there > >> > appears no real interest in doing anything with it. Since effectively > >> > no one uses the code and since the code is buggy let's allow it to be > >> > disabled at compile time. I would just suggest removing the code but > >> > undoubtedly that will break some piece of userspace code somewhere. > >> > > >> > For the distributions that don't care about this piece of code > >> > this gives a nice starting point to make mandatory locking go away. > >> > > >> > Cc: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Cc: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > --- > >> > > >> > A piece of userspace software having problematic interactions with > >> > mandatory locking recently came up as an issue > >> > >> Is there any more interesting story there? > > Only that I overlooked them when implementing user namespace support for > mounting filesystems so it is currently possible to without privilege to > mount tmpfs with mandatory locking enabled and pass a file descriptor to > a daemon that was not expecting them. Causing nice denial of service > attacks. > > So I need to decide what to do with mandatory locking in user > namespaces. > > As the consensus of this thread is that users of mandatory locking are > as rare as hen's teeth I can just not allow mandatory locking if you > something is being mounted just user namespace permissions. Sounds like a plan. If nobody notices this limitation then that's further evidence that we might be able to get away with deprecating it eventually. (Well, I wouldn't be surprised if there's some test suite somewhere that includes a simple test for mandatory lock enforcement. So, any user other than that....) --b. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
