On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 07:55:03AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > And umount-related followups are just that - I'm not asking you to do those, > especially since as I said this stuff is sensitive to fs_pin details (so far > it appears to fold nicely with the __detach_mounts()/umount_tree() stuff, > BTW). PS: it doesn't need namespace_sem taken inside __d_move() - actual detaching does, of course, but that part gets done via task_work_add(), in a reasonably sane locking environment. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
