On 02/03/2015 09:58 AM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > On 02/02/2015 10:19 PM, Saied Kazemi wrote: >> Given the wide spectrum of CRIU use cases, I am also in favor of organizing a >> separate track for it. >> >> To that end, I can present and do a live demo of how CRIU was used to provide >> native Docker container checkpoint and restore. This can be a full presentation >> by itself or combined with another presentation. > > That's great :) I'll start filling the page with data soon then. Feel free to > join and add the stuff you want. > >> A minor nit: for consistency, can we call it checkpoint/restore instead of checkpoint/restart? > > Google gives ~600k results for "checkpoint/restart" vs ~900k for "checkpoint/restore" > so I don't mind :) I prefer "restore" (perhaps a more migration focused term) myself, but I think there is some history behind "restart" (perhaps a more fault tolerance focused term) from at least the Berkeley Lab's Checkpoint/Restart project, which has software releases from 2005 and papers from 2002. http://crd.lbl.gov/departments/computer-science/CLaSS/research/BLCR/ http://crd.lbl.gov/departments/computer-science/CLaSS/research/BLCR/checkpoint-restart-publications/ Chris -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
