On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I think in this case your ID's are still available, but aren't you >> providing a new way >> for the inner netns device to escape which we are trying to avoid? > > It's why the ids depend on user ns. Only if user ns are the same we allow to > get an id for a peer netns. Too late, userns is relatively new, relying on it breaks our existing assumption. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
