Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Eric, > >> As for missing cool tags shrug. The people looking at my code didn't >> feel like saying the magic words so I didn't include cool tags. > > Maybe you should push them ... these tags are not just "cool", they > give less involved people some indications of what has happened in the > life of a patch. Etiquette is a good idea where it helps things flow smoothly. Other times like this standing on etiquette would have resulted in trivial fixes for long standing issues not going anywhere. Althogh I will keep it in mind in the future. >> Which is a my long winded way of say it sounds like you are accusing me >> of being irresponsible, and my way of saying that I have tested and > > I did not mean to accuse, there are reasons (as you have pointed out) > that things get added late, or rewritten. I really try to avoid those reasons but I missed it this round and the buildbot did not manage to find the comibination with a build error until the code hit linux-next :( Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
