Re: [PATCH RFC - TAKE TWO - 06/12] block, bfq: improve responsiveness

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:05:37AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
> @@ -281,7 +323,8 @@ static inline unsigned long bfq_serv_to_charge(struct request *rq,
>  					       struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
>  {
>  	return blk_rq_sectors(rq) *
> -		(1 + ((!bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq)) * bfq_async_charge_factor));
> +		(1 + ((!bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq)) * (bfqq->wr_coeff == 1) *
> +		bfq_async_charge_factor));

Ah, okay, so you actually use it later.  Please disregard my previous
comment about dropping the wrapper.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux