On 05/29/2014 09:59 AM, Vasily Kulikov wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 23:27 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >> On 05/28/2014 10:28 PM, Vasily Kulikov wrote: >>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 16:44 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >>> It will be simplier >>> to parse the file -- if 'ns_ids' file contains some ID then this ID for >>> every ns can be obtained regardless of the specific ID name (SID, PID, >>> PGID, etc.). >> >> True, but given a task PID how to determine which pid namespaces it lives in >> to get the idea of how PIDs map to each other? Maybe we need some explicit >> API for converting (ID, NS1, NS2) into (ID)? > > AFAIU the idea of the patch is to add a new debugging information which > can be trivially obtained via 'cat /proc/...': I agree, but this ability will be very useful by checkpoint-restore project too and I'd really appreciate if the API we have for that would be scalable enough. Per-task proc file works for me, but how about sid-s and pgid-s? > ] We need a direct method of getting the pid inside containers. > ] If some issues occurred inside container guest, host user > ] could not know which process is in trouble just by guest pid: > ] the users of container guest only knew the pid inside containers. > ] This will bring obstacle for trouble shooting. > > A new syscall might complicate trouble shooting by admin. Pure syscall -- yes. What if we teach the ps and top utilities to show additional info? I think that would help. Thanks, Pavel _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
