Re: [PATCH V2 1/6] namespaces: assign each namespace instance a serial number

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 11:30 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 11:13 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 14/05/13, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > On 14/05/10, Eric Paris wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 20:27 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > > > Generate and assign a serial number per namespace instance since boot.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Use a serial number per namespace (unique across one boot of one kernel)
> > > > > instead of the inode number (which is claimed to have had the right to change
> > > > > reserved and is not necessarily unique if there is more than one proc fs) to
> > > > > uniquely identify it per kernel boot.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > > +/**
> > > > > + * ns_serial - compute a serial number for the namespace
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Compute a serial number for the namespace to uniquely identify it in
> > > > > + * audit records.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +unsigned long long ns_serial(void)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(serial_lock);
> > > > > +	static unsigned long long serial = 4; /* reserved for IPC, UTS, user, PID */
> > > > > +	unsigned long flags;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&serial_lock, flags);
> > > > > +	++serial;
> > > > > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&serial_lock, flags);
> > > > > +	BUG_ON(!serial);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	return serial;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static inline struct nsproxy *create_nsproxy(void)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >  	struct nsproxy *nsproxy;
> > > > 
> > > > atomic64_t instead of doing it yourself?
> > > 
> > > I'm willing to switch to atomic64_*.  Thanks for pointing out its
> > > existence.
> > 
> > Same would then go for using atomic_t in audit_serial().
> 
> Yup, moving to an atomic in audit_serial() looks like a good idea to me.

Talking with steve on irc, neither of us see a need for the double
increment quirk if the serial wraps back to 0.  Nothing wrong with 0, it
is a number.

-Eric

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux