On 2014/3/5 3:47, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: >>> Hrm... there is a PF_EXITING check there already: >>> >>> #define task_css_set_check(task, __c) \ >>> rcu_dereference_check((task)->cgroups, \ >>> lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex) || \ >>> lockdep_is_held(&css_set_rwsem) || \ >>> ((task)->flags & PF_EXITING) || (__c)) >>> >>> I see it's not happening on Linus's master so I'll run a bisection to figure out what broke it. >> >> Hi Tejun, >> >> It bisects down to your patch: "cgroup: drop task_lock() protection >> around task->cgroups". I'll look into it later unless it's obvious >> to you. > > Hmmm... maybe I'm confused and PF_EXITING is not set there and > task_lock was what held off the lockdep warning. Confused.... > Because this cgroup_exit() is called in a failure path in copy_process(). _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
