On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:47:57PM +0000, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote: > > Yeah that's not accurate, nor desired I think, because you get into > > horrible problems with hierarchies, do child groups belong to your RMID > > or not? > > I'd rather not support a child group of a child group. Only groups off > the root, and each group would be assigned an RMID when it's activated > for monitoring. Yeah, that's a complete non started for cgroups. Cgroups need to be completely hierarchical. So even the root group should represent all tasks; which if you fragment RMIDs on child cgroups doesn't work anymore. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
