Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/4] veth: backup classid befor switch net_ns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2014/1/3 18:45, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 03-01-2014 7:11, Libo Chen wrote:
> 
>> dev_forward_skb will clear skb->sk, so we need save classid
>> before that, otherwise the skb can not be under control by
>> net_cls.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/veth.c | 7 +++++++
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
>> index 2ec2041..ce43a2d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
> [...]
>> @@ -123,6 +124,12 @@ static netdev_tx_t veth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>           rcv->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM)
>>           skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>>
>> +    /**
> 
>    Why you're using kernel-doc style comments out of place? The format of multi-line comments  in the networking code is this:
> 
> /* bla
>  * bla
>  */

thank you

Libo

> 
>> +     * dev_forward_sbk will clear skb->sk, so save
>> +     * skb->sk->sk_classid for Qos
>> +     */
>> +    bk_cls_classid(skb);
>> +
> 
> WBR, Sergei
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 


_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux