Re: Device Namespaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/containers/2013-May/032591.html
>
> Can't the daemon live outside the container and shuffle stuff in?
> IOW, there seems to be little point in containerizing things if you're
> just going to punch a privilege hole in the namespace.

Yeah. I will try to experiment just how much can be 'stuffed
in' without effective caps. It certainly would be better this way.


> FWIW, I think that the capability evolution rules are crap, but
> changing them is a can of worms, and enough people seem to thing the
> status quo is acceptable that this is unlikely to ever get fixed.

I have noted (Casey almost tried to strangle me during the
last security summit for even daring to talk about it).


-- 
Janne
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux