Re: RFC: Device Namespaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> That being said, is there a valid reason why binder is part of device
> namespace here instead of IPC?

I think the practical issue with binder was simply that binder only
allows for a single instance and thus is does not play nicely with
containers.

Eric

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux