Re: [PATCH 08/11] cpuset: separate configured masks and efffective masks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013/8/21 22:08, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:00:42PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> @@ -2261,7 +2271,8 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
>>  	/* synchronize mems_allowed to N_MEMORY */
>>  	if (mems_updated) {
>>  		mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
>> -		top_cpuset.mems_allowed = new_mems;
>> +		if (!sane)
>> +			top_cpuset.mems_allowed = new_mems;
> 
> Can you please further explain how the top cgroup behaves?
> 

top_cpuset.cpus_allowed will always be cpu_active_mask if sane_behavior
is not set, otherwise it will always be cpu_possible_mask. While
top_cpuset.effective_cpus will always be cpu_active_mask in either
case.

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux