Hello, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:01:21PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > - if (!cpumask_subset(trialcs->cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask)) > + if (!cpumask_subset(trialcs->cpus_allowed, > + top_cpuset.cpus_allowed)) Hmmm... top_cpuset.cpus_allowed is filled using cpumask_setall(), which may include more bits than cpu_possible_mask, which is kinda weird. We probably wanna initialize it with cpu_possible_mask and also maybe using cpu_possible_mask in the above would be clearer? Also, shouldn't this be dependent upon sane_behavior? Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
