Hello, On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > IMO, list_del() is preferred when the object shouldn't be reused (i.e. > it gets taken off a list and then it's freed). list_del_init() could > hide bugs. Nah... use-after-frees are detected much more reliably by poisoning anyway. Using list_del() instead of list_del_init() to hunt down use-after-free isn't a good idea because you're likely to corrupt the memory of unrelated area. I really don't see much point in using list_del(). Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
