Hello, Daniel. On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:30:50AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Uhm. So I don't think we will support two ways to set this up for long > > in systemd (if at all). And even if we did, the distributions would pick > > one or the other as default, and if you are unlucky, then you couldn't > > run libvirt on it without reconfiguration and rebooting to get the other > > cgroup setup logic... > > Yep, that's exactly what concerns me. If systemd introduced the option I don't think you two are speaking about the same problem. Lennart is saying that backward compat option won't stay for long and you're worrying about the method to enable compatibility mode. > for a new style setup, then it would almost certainly be adopted by > default by Fedora (otherwise there's no point adding it). At which > point libvirt is doomed. We can't require people to reconfigure systemd > and reboot to use virt. Yeah, it's cumbersome, but if it's pressing we can make the release of controllers from unified hierarchy dynamic I suppose. I'll think more about it. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
