On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 12:15:56PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:13:02PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Some resources controlled by cgroup aren't per-task and cgroup core > > allowing threads of a single thread_group to be in different cgroups > > forced memcg do explicitly find the group leader and use it. This is > > gonna be nasty when transitioning to unified hierarchy and in general > > we don't want and won't support granularity finer than processes. > > With libvirt and KVM we require the ability to put different threads > in different cgroups for the "cpu", "cpuset" & "cpuacct" controllers. > This is to allow us to control schedular tunables / placement for > QEMU vCPU threads, independantly of limits for QEMU I/O threads. So > requiring all threads of a process to be in the same cgroup isn't > sufficiently flexible for our needs. For placement of vCPU threads, can we set per thread cpu affinity (sched_setaffinity()), instead of using cgroups for that purpose. Apart from cpu affinity, what scheduling parameters we want different between different threads. Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
