On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Serge E. Hallyn <serge@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Uh, I would say nack, and if you need this then a device > namespace allowing you to 'pass' devices similarly to how you > pass a physical nic to a child netns is a part of the answer. Hmm, 'slight' issue is that it does not really exist and that ns can not even be properly specified as functionality (we tried that earlier didn't we - everyone had different opinion on what that ns should really do). > Your goals are not 100% clear to me. What is it about a user > namespace that you want? I'm trying to experiment with a system that has init_ns size of one tiny task and apart from that everything runs inside containers. Because of this I need a way to elevate rights of certain trusted applications inside user namespaces so that they could operate against things requesting rights from init ns. -- Janne _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
