Re: cgroup: status-quo and userland efforts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Li.

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:17:17PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
...
> > hot-unplug).  It currently transfers all its tasks to the nearest
> > ancestor with executing resources, which is an irreversible process
> > which would affect all other co-mounted controllers.  We probably want
> > it to just take on the masks of the ancestor until its own executing
> > resources become online again, and the new behavior should be gated
> > behind a switch (Li, can you please look into this?).
> > 
> 
> Sure, I'll be working on sane hierarchy behavior for cpuset.

Great, it'd be great if you can share how it's gonna be done once the
basic design gets settled before full implementation.

Thanks a lot!

-- 
tejun
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux