On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 11:43:03AM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote: >> A year later - what ever happened with this? I want it more than ever >> for Google's use. > > I think the conclusion was "use kmemcg instead". Pardon my ignorance, but... what? Use kernel memory limits as a proxy for process/thread counts? That sounds terrible - I hope I am misunderstanding? This task counter patch had several properties that mapped very well to what we want. Is it dead in the water? _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
