(2013/04/01 18:01), Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote: > (2013/04/01 17:48), Glauber Costa wrote: >>>> +static int memcg_try_charge_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp, u64 size) >>>> +{ >>>> + int retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES; >>> >>> I'm not sure this retry numbers, for anon/file LRUs is suitable for kmem. >>> >> Suggestions ? >> > > I think you did tests. sorry.. I think you did tests and know what number is good by tests. If it's the same number to MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES, I have no objections. I think no reason is bad. Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers