Re: [PATCH 2/4] fs: allow dev accesses in userns in controlled situations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Classic on/off toggle case is easy though, but are there enough
>> reasons for merging such 'noop' namespace?
>
> Eric's point is precisely that we may be able to work aruond it
> sufficiently that we don't need to.  Noone has proposed a specific
> design let alone code, so it's premature to talk about merging
> anything :)

Well let's see that after I get this booting :P


--
Janne
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers


[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux