On 2013/01/26 10:26, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> There is no backing store to tmpfs and file creation rules are the
> same as for any other filesystem so it is semantically safe to allow
> unprivileged users to mount it. ramfs is safe for the same reasons so
> allow either flavor of tmpfs to be mounted by a user namespace root
> user.
>
> The memory control group successfully limits how much memory tmpfs can
> consume on any system that cares about a user namespace root using
> tmpfs to exhaust memory the memory control group can be deployed.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
useful to me,thanks Eric & Serge.
Acked-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> mm/shmem.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 5c90d84..197ca5e 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -2766,6 +2766,7 @@ static struct file_system_type shmem_fs_type = {
> .name = "tmpfs",
> .mount = shmem_mount,
> .kill_sb = kill_litter_super,
> + .fs_flags = FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
> };
>
> int __init shmem_init(void)
> @@ -2823,6 +2824,7 @@ static struct file_system_type shmem_fs_type = {
> .name = "tmpfs",
> .mount = ramfs_mount,
> .kill_sb = kill_litter_super,
> + .fs_flags = FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
> };
>
> int __init shmem_init(void)
>
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
