On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:21:55AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 02:18:54PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > Yeah, hmmm, maybe we should add another set of counters to carry stats > > > from dead ones? Avoiding hierarchical accounting overhead in hot path > > > while remembering by-gones shouldn't be that hard. Will work on that. > > > > So are you planning to migrate the stats to parent when a cgroup is being > > deleted? That should make sure we don't do hierarhical update. > > Yeah, something like that. The current statistics being !hierarchical > means that we need to keep them separate from the actual stats, so > it'll end up with another set of stats. Kinda nasty but I don't see > any better way out. Separate stats for hierarchical migration make sense to me. Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
