"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx): >> A child user namespace having capabilities against processes in it's >> parent seems totally bizarre and pretty dangerous from a capabilities >> standpoint. > > How would it have them against its parent? init_user_ns userns a --- created by kuid 1 userns b -- created by kuid 2 process c in userns b with kuid 1 Serge read the first permisison check in common_cap. Think what happens in the above example. For the rest I understand your concern. Serge please read and look at the patches I have posted to fix the issues Andy found with the user namespace tree. Especially the fix to commit_creds. After you have looked at the patches to fix the issues I will be happy to discuss things further with you. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers