On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> One more issue: the requirement that both upper and lower uids (etc.) >> in the maps are in order is rather limiting. I have no objection if >> you only require upper ids to be monotonic, but currently there's no >> way to may root outside to uid n (for n > 0) and some nonroot user >> outside to uid 0. > > There is. You may set up to 5 (extents). You just have to use a second > extent for the non-contiguous bits. My reader is lazy and you have to > set all of the extents with a single write, so you may have missed the > ability to set more than one extent. > If I'm wrong, I'll happily eat my words. Both: 0 1 1 1 0 1 and 1 0 1 0 1 1 are rejected, unless I totally messed up. --Andy _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
