On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:25:18AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > In general, do not use blkcg on faster storage. In current form it > is at best suitable for single rotational SATA/SAS disk. I have not > been able to figure out how to provide fairness without group idling. I think cfq is just the wrong approach for faster non-rotational devices. We should be allocating iops instead of time slices. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
