Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I keep asking myself if it isn't the case of forwarding to a container > all messages printed in process context. That will obviously exclude all > messages resulting from kthreads - that will always be in the initial > namespace anyway, interrupts, etc. There is no harm, for instance, in > delivering the same message twice: one to the container, and the other > to the host system. Except that there is harm in double printing. One of the better justifications for doing something with the kernel log is that it is possible to overflow the kernel log with operations performed exclusively in a container. I do think the idea of process context printks going to the current container one worth playing with. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
