Re: [PATCH 06/11] pidns: Don't allow new processes in a dead pid namespace.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



on 2012/11/17 00:35, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Set nr_hashed to -1 just before we schedule the work to cleanup proc.
> Test nr_hashed just before we hash a new pid and if nr_hashed is < 0
> fail.
> 
> This guaranteees that processes never enter a pid namespaces after we
> have cleaned up the state to support processes in a pid namespace.
> 
> Currently sending SIGKILL to all of the process in a pid namespace as
> init exists gives us this guarantee but we need something a little
> stronger to support unsharing and joining a pid namespace.
> 
> Acked-by: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Acked-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers


[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux