Hello, Daniel. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 02:59:58PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote: > Sorry to bring this up again: how should to root cgroup behave? If > the ultimate goal to have only one single hierarchy then I would > assume it is important that the semantic for all controllers are the > same. As you pointed out the networking controllers are kind of a > strange beast in the zoo of the cgroup controllers. But still I > would assume that all root controllers behave the same. memcg or > cpu* are not expected to do any work in the root cgroup. I think the implemented behavior is fine. memcg or cpu* don't do anything on root cgroup as it doesn't make much (or any) sense. For net_prio and cls, I don't see any reason to treat root cgroup differently and how that would cause conflict when mounted together with other controllers. So, yeah, things seem okay to me. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
